Here we are, down to our last Cob of The Week before bowl season. Unfortunately, I think this one is a layup. Okay, maybe not. I could miss a layup.
It's a twinkie. Okay, that's not right either, because you eat a twinkie, it's easy, it tastes good for a minute and it's gone. This one neither tastes good, nor will it ever leave.
Ah, I know what this is. It's like mashing your thumb with a hammer. It hurts like hell for a while, then it goes away. Unfortunately, you're probably going to keep smashing your thumb every once in a while when you pick up a hammer. So... it really doesn't ever go away, does it? Year after year, the same action, the same pain, and then you come back and do it again.
You're really stupid, aren't you?

Husker Mike: My nomination: the BCS.
For years, we've been fed the line that going to a playoff makes the regular season meaningless. So now we find teams scheduling as many non-conference cupcakes as they can find. Then, to top if all off this year, we get Alabama vs. LSU for a second time. Just nevermind that meaningless game last month, this one is REALLY for all the Tostitos.
OK, ok. Let's look at the other BCS games. Oklahoma State/Stanford? That's going to be a really nice matchup in the Fiesta. Oregon/Wisconsin? Not bad either. Keep in mind that those are the type of bowl games we would have gotten back in the 80's and early 90's, before this whole BCS/locked-in bowl agreements situation exploded.
Then there is Clemson/West Virginia in the Orange. What is up with that? That's not Orange Bowl material; that's a Peach or Gator Bowl matchup. And Michigan/Virginia Tech? Really? How the heck did the Hokies get an at-large berth? Who the heck did they beat this season? For that matter, who the hell did they even play this season?
Matt: I don't have anyone other than the BCS. Every year, I watch less and less games because of them. I have NO interest in and LSU/Alabama rematch and there's no WAY I'm going to watch the Orange Bowl....again.
Jon: Oh.... Oklahoma. Just because.
Oklahoma could have made things a little easier on everyone if they would have only put up a fight. A close game with Oklahoma State would make it easier to accept that Alabama was the team that deserved to be in the national title game against LSU.
But alas, the Sooners did not put up a fight, allowing the Cowboys to dismantle them much the same way a five-year old pounds a small ant hill with a hammer. "There's no real threat here" says the boy and pretends he's god, crushing the tiny insects without a thought.
Ten points is all your offense can manage against a team that's supposed to have one of the worst defenses in the nation? Ten? I don't care that you lost Ryan Broyles and Dominique Whaley, you're supposed to have those kind of guys stacked out back like cords of firewood.
You had a chance to make this easier for everyone. You blew it. You suck, Sooners.
Oh, and bad halves by Ohio, LSU, and Georgia.
I'm not even going to mention Virginia Tech, because Hokies, you are now so dead to me.
0 recs | 14 comments
F the BCS
/drops mic
//walks off
///trips, tears ACL, sobs
Fake Pelini - December 6, 2011 via mobile
That is a pretty nice sweatshirt that BGB has on there.
Gotta give him that.
CarolinaHawk - December 6, 2011
The sweatshirt looks...
shiny. I think BGB is asking “can anybody here play this game?”
Hey Huskers, just want to say that there are a number of folks who wear red out here in Boise and they are a classy bunch without exception. Diehard (way) but classy.
HSridge - December 6, 2011
Yeah on first glance
I thought it was some sort of spandex or something. And I’m glad to hear they acquit themselves well. Welcome to the blog, thanks for dropping in!
jdhusker - December 6, 2011
BCS SUCKS!!!!!!
Huzkerfan - December 6, 2011
I will be the lone voice not to bask the BCS...
…regardless of the format, there would be a selection process that is open to manipulation.
1. I bash the coaches, sportswriters, and former players who voted for this match up.
2. I give them a 2nd lashing for manipulating their votes – Okie Lite 4th and lower on their ballots is fixing the results to give the nod to Bama, not voting their belief of who the best teams are.
3. I bash ESPN and other sportscasters for promoting this match up.
Please send the message
You can watch the NC game, just don’t view on a Nielson monitored TV set (personally, I have no intention of watching a single down).
There is enough valid reasons to bash the BCS without blaming it for blatant manipulation by the pollsters and biased promotion by the sportscasters.
ProveIt - December 6, 2011
Don't watch on either a Neilsen monitored set OR
on your digital cable — your cable company tracks all info on what you watch. There are ratings both for overnight viewings of TV shows and then adding in the audience who watch it on their DVRs w/in 24hrs and within 7 days.
KC Gunner - December 7, 2011
Thanks for the info.
I was wondering if they tracked cable tuners automatically.
…quit watching all of the BCS bowls or all bowls and they blame it on the popularity of NCAAF being down.
Watching all but the NC and they lose their out.
Nothing would drive the message home more than the NCG having lower ratings than 2 or 3 other bowls, or lower ratings in a year when viewership is up.
ProveIt - December 7, 2011
I blame the players for the failure of the BCS.
If they just executed to the level with which they’ve been assigned, there would be no difficulty in determining national champions.
Salt Creek and Stadium - December 6, 2011
Yeah,
if they’d just keep their noses out of thoses damned textbooks and in the playbooks where they belong…..
redvalley - December 6, 2011
I think that is the motto of all Texas high schools
Robsa - December 6, 2011
and Pop Warner leagues
or whatever ESPN is calling them now that they televise the National Championship with the 9 year olds. (really?!)
brutus1382 - December 6, 2011
I just threw up in my mouth a little.
It is disgusting enough to watch the pressure they place on 13 year olds in some Olympic sports.
Now they are televising 9 year old National Championships?
ProveIt - December 7, 2011
Giving . .
Kirk Ferentz more ammo behind “failure to execute”. Now it has MNC implications.
OhReally? - December 7, 2011
You must Login with your SB Nation account and be a member of Corn Nation to post a comment.